Yes, the $160 cost of attending this January’s March for Life is down
almost $100 from last year. But we recognize that $160 is still a lot of
money, especially for a college student. So here's your chance to reduce
the amount you pay even further.
Thanks to the generosity of St. Thomas Catholic Church, this year SFL is
able to give out $50 scholarships to up to four individual March-goers. To
be considered for the scholarship, interested persons need to write a
brief, 1-2 page response on the following topic.
Prompt: What do you hope to get out of attending this year's March for
Life?
Due: Essays must be emailed to umstudentsforlife@gmail.com by 12:00pm on Monday,
November 28th. Scholarship recipients will be announced that evening at the
meeting.
Special Note: In order to ensure that judging is as objective as possible,
please DO NOT PUT YOUR NAME ON THE FRONT PAGE OF THE ESSAY!!! Instead,
include your name and email in a SEPERATE PAGE AT THE VERY END OF THE
ESSAY!
Finally, please note that it is certainly to everyone's advantage to submit
at least something. We have four scholarships to give away, so even those
who don't consider essay-writing a strongpoint could win by default! Let me know if you have any questions.
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
March for Life money due next Monday!!!
Barring the end of the world, exactly two months from now 40 SFLers will be
in Washington D.C. with 400,000+ other pro-lifers getting ready to march on
the National Mall. That's right, the annual March for Life is approaching,
and approaching fast!
To that end, this is just a reminder that the payment for the March is due
by NEXT MONDAY, NOVEMBER 28th. The cost this year is $160 (down from last
year's $240). If you are planning on going on the March, We will need this
full amount no later than next Monday's meeting in the Union. Checks may be
made out to "Students for Life at the University of Michigan." We have 40
spots available.
Let me know if you have any questions. Also, anyone who is interested but
who cannot, for one reason or another, make the payment deadline should
contact us ASAP.
in Washington D.C. with 400,000+ other pro-lifers getting ready to march on
the National Mall. That's right, the annual March for Life is approaching,
and approaching fast!
To that end, this is just a reminder that the payment for the March is due
by NEXT MONDAY, NOVEMBER 28th. The cost this year is $160 (down from last
year's $240). If you are planning on going on the March, We will need this
full amount no later than next Monday's meeting in the Union. Checks may be
made out to "Students for Life at the University of Michigan." We have 40
spots available.
Let me know if you have any questions. Also, anyone who is interested but
who cannot, for one reason or another, make the payment deadline should
contact us ASAP.
Monday, November 21, 2011
Blog surpasses 1,000 hits! When will the petition do the same?
Right now it's looking like it may be quite awhile, as we currently have only have 93 signers. Have you signed the petition yet?
Monday, November 14, 2011
Have you signed the petition yet?
The U currently mandates that international undergraduate students purchase health care that includes abortion coverage. Yes, you read that correctly.
If this makes you unhappy, which it should, help put an end to it by signing our petition! Anyone with a UMich uniquename can sign. You do not need to be an international student. The petition text states as follows:
Yes, on this issue SFL is pro-choice.
If this makes you unhappy, which it should, help put an end to it by signing our petition! Anyone with a UMich uniquename can sign. You do not need to be an international student. The petition text states as follows:
The University should offer a separate insurance plan for international students so that these students will not be required to fund abortions. In this new insurance plan, students will be able to select whether or not to fund abortions; those who choose not to pay for abortions will allow the money that would have gone to abortions to be distributed in other areas covered by the insurance plan.This petition isn't just for pro-lifers. It's for anyone who wants the right to choose what he/she does with his/her own...money.
Yes, on this issue SFL is pro-choice.
Thursday, November 3, 2011
Backwards, Medieval, anti-Science Pro-Lifers...
...present medical evidence that life begins at conception. Surely the other side pointed out that their argument was false and lacked any proper scientific evidence to support it? Nope. Instead they got a friendly reminder from Advocates for Choice that "science cannot be applied to my body". I'll have to remember that one the next time I'm in the Emergency Room.
Tuesday, November 1, 2011
Abortion doesn't empower women
From the Op-Ed section of the Michigan Daily, by our own Elise Aikman!
Great job, Elise!
Great job, Elise!
VIEWPOINT: ABORTION DOESN'T EMPOWER WOMEN
By Elise Aikman
I participated in an abortion debate held by the Michigan Political Union last Monday. Several times throughout the event, students raised concern about the impact of abortion bans on the poor. Legalizing abortion, they argued, not only spares children from suffering in dire poverty, but can also empower women to break through the poverty cycle.The impoverished conditions, under which the majority of the world’s population lives, are truly appalling. However, I believe the suggestion that legalizing abortion should play a part in reducing poverty is gravely flawed for two reasons. First, it is inappropriate to solve societal problems by eliminating the people affected. We don’t fight malaria by killing those with malarial infections. Similarly, we shouldn’t fight poverty by aborting the poor. Secondly, there is no evidence that legalizing abortion helps women break through poverty. True women’s empowerment requires education, material resources and personal support — not abortion.One reason given for legalizing abortion in underdeveloped countries is that abortion spares children from a life of poverty and suffering. Easing suffering is a commendable goal, and one that I share, but when the desire to prevent suffering leads us to eliminate those who will suffer, we commit a grave error.Last summer, I visitedKenya and. There I saw village after village of malnourished children. I mention this because I want to make it clear that in no way do I wish to trivialize the suffering of billions of people. On the contrary, the severity and extent of the extreme poverty those children live in overwhelmed me. However, the fact that those children suffer does not make their lives valueless. The suffering they endure does not take away their worth as human beings. It is not up to us, the privileged, to say that children, who will be born into desperately poor circumstances, simply shouldn’t be born at all. Rather, we have an obligation as privileged residents of a privileged country, to share our blessings with those who have less. Uganda Those on both sides of the abortion debate must do more to improve material conditions for the poor, both in theand abroad. How we choose to provide that support — through government aid, non-profit organizations or cultivating personal relationships — is another matter. The point is we can’t, in good conscience, fight poverty by killing those who will experience it. United States Secondly, abortion advocates are misguided when they insist that legalizing abortion empowers women. Susan B. Anthony, leader of 19th century campaigns for women’s suffrage, writes: “When a man steals to satisfy hunger, we may safely conclude that there is something wrong in society — so when a woman destroys the life of her unborn child, it is an evidence that either by education or circumstances she has been greatly wronged.”
Anthony recognized that women seeking abortion do not do so because they feel empowered. On the contrary, they are often motivated by a sense of desperation. There is tragic irony in the fact that while abortion rights advocates offer slogans of “choice,” it is often the case that women seek abortions because they feel they have no alternative. Furthermore, before we advocate for legal abortion overseas, we should examine whether abortion has improved conditions for the poor in our own country.Nearly four decades after Roe v. Wade legalized abortion in the, inequality is higher, not lower, than it was in 1973. Look at U.S. , which has 14 abortion clinics. Correlation is certainly not causation, yet it is safe to say that access to legal abortion has not kept Detroit women out of poverty. Legalizing abortion in Detroit will not make Kenyan women less poor. Abortion will not educate them or provide better hospitals or income. These are the areas where we should focus our efforts to empower women — education, maternal and child health care, financial opportunities such as microfinance, etc. Misplaced emphasis on legal abortion for impoverished women distracts from the lack of educational and material resources that drives them to seek abortion in the first place. Kenya The reality is that women want to bring their children into a world where they can adequately care and provide for them. Efforts to empower women should target the lack of educational opportunities, material resources and personal support that lead women to feel that they cannot bring that child into the world — the reasons women seek abortion in the first place. Let’s work together in a genuine creative effort to find real, workable solutions to poverty, but not by aborting the children of the poor.On Wednesday, Nov. 9 three women who chose abortion will be speaking about this experience and its effect on them to the campus community. It will be in the Henderson Room of the Michigan League at 7 p.m. with a question-and-answer period to follow the speakers. I would encourage anyone who is interested to attend.
Sunday, October 30, 2011
If you have a sensitive stomach...
...you may want to refrain from reading this news article from LifeSiteNews.
Folks, this just goes to show that if you can justify killing a baby in the womb, you can justify just about anything. If the following doesn't convince someone of the evil of the abortion industry, we don't know what will. Thank God the law is finally coming down on these people, but it's a shame our legal system doesn't recognize that every abortion "clinic" is indeed a "House of Horrors."
[Hat tip to a SV and IV, our fellow allies from the debate, for bringing this to our attention.]
Folks, this just goes to show that if you can justify killing a baby in the womb, you can justify just about anything. If the following doesn't convince someone of the evil of the abortion industry, we don't know what will. Thank God the law is finally coming down on these people, but it's a shame our legal system doesn't recognize that every abortion "clinic" is indeed a "House of Horrors."
[Hat tip to a SV and IV, our fellow allies from the debate, for bringing this to our attention.]
Workers at ‘House of Horrors’ abortion clinic plead guilty to murder
Workers at ‘House of Horrors’ abortion clinic plead guilty to murder
October 26, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Two former employees of late-term abortionist Kermit Gosnell have pled guilty to 3rd degree murder charges for their roles in the deaths of an abortion patient and one baby born alive during a failed late-term abortion.
Former Gosnell employees Adrienne Moton and Sherry West.This is reportedly the first time that an abortion worker has been found guilty of murder for killing a baby.
Former Gosnell employee Adrienne Moton admitted her part in the murder of one baby. Another employee, Sherry West, pled guilty for helping to drug abortion client Karanaya Mongar to death during a botched abortion. Neither women had any medical training or licensing.
The pair also pled guilty to lesser charges, including participating in a corrupt organization.
Gosnell, who ran an abortion facility in Philadelphia that has been dubbed a “House of Horrors,” has been charged with eight counts of murder, including of seven newborn babies and one client, and is awaiting trial. Moton and West may testify against his as part of their plea agreement.
According to testimony by former employees, Gosnell and his assistants killed “hundreds” of newborn babies by severing their spinal cords rather than killing them in the womb, because the abortionist was too unskilled to administer the lethal injection in utero.
After news of the conditions in the clinic broke earlier this year, “scores” of women stepped forward to tell their horror stories of forced abortions and abysmally poor care at the hands of Gosnell and his employees.
Investigators who raided the facility had found that the abortion equipment itself was broken, dirty, and rusty; downstairs, the dismembered remains of newborn and nearly-born children were stuffed into jars, bags, milk jugs, and cat food containers. Others shared space in a refrigerator-freezer with employees’ lunches.
Upon entering the building, investigators were hit by the stench of cat urine and the sight of drugged and moaning women lying on blood-stained blankets. Flea-ridden cats defecated freely on the bloodied floors.
A Grand Jury report in January detailed testimony from clinic staff who said that “killing large, late-term babies who had been observed breathing and moving was a regular occurrence” at the filthy clinic: one staffer said such events happened “hundreds” of times. Another clinic worker, Tina Baldwin, told the investigators that Gosnell once joked about a baby that was writhing as he cut its neck: “that’s what you call a chicken with its head cut off.”
That same Grand Jury report had issued scathing indictments of both the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the Department of State for turning a blind eye to the clinic. The report said the government agencies had allowed the clinic to wallow in filth for years, and ignored several complaints lodged against the abortionist, while allowing his official record to remain clean.
“As disturbing as this case is, we know that what went on at Gosnell’s abortion mill is little different than what goes on at late-term abortion mills around the country,” said Operation Rescue President Troy Newman in response to the news.
“We look forward to a full airing of the evidence in a court of law so Americans can come face to face with the atrocity of abortion. Maybe if we finally have a public airing of the truth about what goes on inside abortion clinics, American will stop tolerating the barbaric, unnecessary, and outdated practice. This case serves as a warning to abortionists who break the law. Sooner or later you will get caught.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
